Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Photos Of Canine Ringworm When Drawing, Do You Refer To Real Photos As Well As Other Drawings?

When drawing, do you refer to real photos as well as other drawings? - photos of canine ringworm

I'm not the best shooter in the world, and certainly not from the head, with the exception of words (usually prepares dogs or other dogs). But you see in the picture to see other artists as they designed? Or keep the copy.
I do it at some point to see how they dressed, is as real pictures sometimes difficult to transfer to the paper for me. Then I asked myself, "what appears to be copied!

5 comments:

eringobr... said...

I keep a record of reference, three laptops and two 2-drawer filing cabinets ... to examine not only the details of my drawings, but also see how other artists solve the problems of lighting and posture. It is immoral, when their work copied and passed on as your own ... I use it as a reference.
I needed a photo of a rifle M-1 for a presentation that I did for a book about the Code Talkers ...... There are some collectors here in the city, but nobody has shown a real weapon (too scared that if the property is regulated, they lose them) and I need for the treatment of barrel used in the Pacific to see quite different from those in ECO was different. Finally I found a color photo in an old edition of a magazine hunting, so I filed to remove when you need it.

lidybeff said...

When you learn, you can use any tool available, including copies of other designs. It is a good way to pick up new techniques and styles.
But if you sell your photos, you can not copy the work of another artist is not just his name followed by "after this and that." So and so is the name of the original artist.

Vince M said...

I agree that the "copy" is a great way to start is the practice, but the best original images on drawing real life. With live models is the absolute best way to accurately record to a real life.

However, patterns of life, not for most amateurs and professionals, if possible, so that the work is the evidence of the photo is the only viable option for me as an example for the preparation of an initial presentation of a fox and her kits in their den . When I have a client who has this representation needs, I mean a file of newspaper clippings, collection of books, magazines and other sources. I have thousands of these cuts, PLUS a picture of a few records of securities, and now the entire Internet, from which to draw the pictures as a reference.

I can face and head from one photo, the place to another place, the front legs of a third party outside of the hind legs of a room and the location to shoot the tail of a photo. Add a little artistic freedom to the final composition, and I've drawn a very original hand, realistic representation of the Fox.

Copying a personthe original work of art is fraud if you use the loan and sells it as yours. The use of this artwork and the reference image is perfectly legitimate for the learning of technical and anatomical features. If you learn how to color a Whipporwill Arkansas, then I am referring to the work of Audubon. When I come to the sale, I will examine how animals behave, either through personal observation, I can, or photographic or not.

Vince M said...

I agree that the "copy" is a great way to start is the practice, but the best original images on drawing real life. With live models is the absolute best way to accurately record to a real life.

However, patterns of life, not for most amateurs and professionals, if possible, so that the work is the evidence of the photo is the only viable option for me as an example for the preparation of an initial presentation of a fox and her kits in their den . When I have a client who has this representation needs, I mean a file of newspaper clippings, collection of books, magazines and other sources. I have thousands of these cuts, PLUS a picture of a few records of securities, and now the entire Internet, from which to draw the pictures as a reference.

I can face and head from one photo, the place to another place, the front legs of a third party outside of the hind legs of a room and the location to shoot the tail of a photo. Add a little artistic freedom to the final composition, and I've drawn a very original hand, realistic representation of the Fox.

Copying a personthe original work of art is fraud if you use the loan and sells it as yours. The use of this artwork and the reference image is perfectly legitimate for the learning of technical and anatomical features. If you learn how to color a Whipporwill Arkansas, then I am referring to the work of Audubon. When I come to the sale, I will examine how animals behave, either through personal observation, I can, or photographic or not.

Rhuby said...

Cheating is an excellent way to learn, people tend to copy the drawings and paintings by great masters, their skills further. The key is that your copy Annaliza. If you are not only mechanical forms - which is good.
When developing an image that a good design idea is, without looking, have a general idea that you do a portrait in miniature.
Then, if you have an idea, you start the design phase is to organize all elements of your drawing, testing their perspective, anatomy begin - if so, in the Digest. For a dog, you should understand the skeleton to be that everything, make sure to install correctly, the legs, to see the right proportions and everything.
Once you have a good, solid design plan, details, light, shadow, skin, anything you want to add. Can perform this step, you would like for tutorials on the skin or the type of dog pictures of your design to see what kind of structure of the skin, as long as the class of models and what to do.
Even professionals use refereNCES. This is not cheating, your not expected to remember exactly how it appears that his brain.
When you copy images, rather than away with it, so make sure your design Annaliza not simply copy mechanically. Copying is a way to learn if you do just the same picture, without thinking that you can use a copy machine.

Post a Comment